Latest finding is not a good lead
The end of the MilkyOr as, maybe.
Or did it, had already happened?
No !
To say its good news or bad one is an overstatement for a believer
Its is a very wrong assertion as our perspective defers.
It's may be any news for those who believe in the 2012 Mayan dateline apocalypse theory.
We knew definitely that the world will not end 2012.
Various calendars that originated from the medieval periods are based on physical phenomenon that they observe around them e.g patterns of the Sun, Moon, Stars etc
If the Mayan way of life is to pull out human hearts when the Sun refused to fertilize their crops.
THAT'S SERIOUS
I found it hard to believe a more intelligent period like ours will revisit a program that lead the then inhabitants to remove thousands of heart when rain refuse to fall and fertilize their crops!
Issues and arguments that the accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years is a futile endeavor.What the Mayans
Their doomsday worries may be based on eclipses which they believe governs the pattern of rainfall as it is essential to livelihood. .
An empirical fact that Mayan
The problem is that we are using a failed religious calendar to propound a valid date.
What the litmus test of a correct apocalyptic calendar might be, as a bases to focus on areas that made the current interpretation wrong, the foundation on which the calender stood is faulty, a barbaric
Certainly Mayan doomsday theorists may need to induct another ancient calendar to pitch their apocalyptic hopes.
This time a more humane ancient peoples must be a criterion of study
No comments:
Post a Comment